Animal Rights versus Human Rights
Sunday, August 31st, 2008There is a lot of controversy in the news these days regarding the “rescue” of animals, especially dogs and rabbits, from reportedly unhealthy living conditions. This is a very emotionally-charged issue. It will be my attempt in this article to insert a modicum of decency and logic into this debate.
One thing is certain; it is unlikely that animal breeders and animal rescuers will ever see eye-to-eye. Each of their individual belief systems spews flames of self-righteousness into their minds and hearts at the slightest hint of this topic being raised. Once self-righteousness takes over communications comes abruptly to an end. There is no room in Dodge for these two gun-slingers. Only one can possibly be right and the other has to go… or at least the scenario seems to go.
Below are some brief outlines of the separate belief systems as it pertains to rabbits:
Rescue Groups: House Rabbit of Society, National Humane Society
- Breeding any animal is bad.
- Caging an animal is bad.
- Selling an animal is bad.
- Raising an animal for food is bad.
- An excessive supply of unwanted pets especially dogs, cats, & rabbits burdens animal shelters and results in a large number of euthanized animals.
- All pet animals should be required to be neutered/spayed and even micro-chipped.
- Rabbits should be able to roam free, have access to an ample supply of feed at all times, and live peacefully with other rabbits in a setting of idyllic bliss.
- Breeder organizations cannot be trusted.
Breeder Groups: American Rabbit Breeders Association - ARBA
- Breeding an animal is good. It provides a complete sense of understanding and knowledge about the animal being raised. Through animal husbandry training children are provided a healthy understanding of animals needs and an understanding of the responsibilities associated with animal care-giving.
- Caging an animal is good. It provides a safe and clean environment to insure the health and well-being of the individual.
- Selling an animal is good. It provides an opportunity to share the love of one has for a particular animal with others. It also provides a flow of resources to the breeder to enable them to afford to provide the best living conditions possible for the animal.
- Raising an animal for food is good. In a world whose food supply is dangerously at risk from mass-production and corporate centralization, it is becoming increasingly important to develop locally grown and raised food to insure a healthy and safe food supply.
- An excessive supply of unwanted pets is not the fault of the breeders. Public education to develop a clear understanding of the responsibilities associated with raising a pet is what is needed. We live in a throw-away society and throw-away pets fall into the same category as throw-away marriages and families. It is a symptom of a greater problem that is not resolved by attacking responsible animal breeders or pet owners.
- Mandatory spay/neutering should be considered only on a case-by-case basis with the well-being of the animal and the responsible nature of the owner taken into consideration.
- The domestic rabbit has never lived in the wild. It is not genetically related to the cotton-tail or jack-rabbit species. It has been domesticated for 1000s of years and only exists today because of man’s efforts to grow and develop the species.
- Rescue groups cannot be trusted.
I recognize that I allowed my biases to affect the lists above. It is difficult to stand on one side of a fence and totally understand the perspective from the other side of the fence. And this is the source of the problem… breeders and rescue groups both feel they are doing what is best for the animal. They both love the animals. They both think their perspective is right. And, as listed in the bullets, they both do not trust the other.
The sad fact is that there are situations where the health of the animals is at risk. The problem is the defining of what “at risk” means. When we willingly set aside our feelings of self-righteousness and openly validate each others opinions we can come to realize that neither group is 100% right. There are severe pet issues that need to be addressed in our society. But there are also legitimate constitutional rights being violated in the name of “rescue” as well. How do we balance the two? How can we eliminate the bad without tramping the constitution into the dirt? How can we “rescue” and maintain due-process at the same time? How can we save bunnies without destroying people’s lives?
In a pressured-charged and divisive society, it is time to come together in all issues of debate. The red and blue divisiveness on a political scale permeates the seeds of self-righteousness in all levels of society. This divisiveness is tearing apart the fabric of our country and destroying all that is good about America. The constitution is tattered and hate permeates our Judeo-Christian upbringing that is supposed to be founded in love.
Which side is right? Where are we headed as a society? Aren’t there more important issues facing us today such as poverty, national health care, and global warming that desperately need the bulk of our resources? Is it right to be at war over the differing opinions how a rabbit should be housed when children around the world are starving and dieing of malaria? Isn’t it time to set aside our differences, set some working standards that are acceptable to both sides and then turn our attention to the really important issues facing our country and planet? We can continue feeding our feelings of self-righteousness and destroy all that is good about our country or we can put our rich resources to work together to build a better tomorrow…. the choice is ours.